Topic
All published responses concerning Scientific Models and Assumptions.
Book
Ross’s biological-production argument needs an inventory and explicit accumulation model. The FAO annual-energy estimate is not a universal maximum, and the table cells were unavailable in the text extraction.
Book
Heat and radiation are serious objections to proposed accelerated Flood mechanisms. Genesis’s global scope does not supply a physical solution, and Scripture does not require those particular mechanisms.
Book
Jeremiah’s covenant assurance and Romans’s hope for creation do not specify laboratory constants. This YEC response distinguishes their theological meaning from tests of particular physical models.
Book
The Flood calendar supplies real constraints, but does not identify an ice-age melt or Hormuz barrier. Both regional and global models need to explain the text and their physical assumptions.
Book
Ross’s ancient Flood date depends on identifying biblical events with proposed natural history. This YEC response separates the text’s chronology from those identifications.
Book
Ross uses extra dimensions to illuminate biblical doctrine. First Corinthians 2 concerns Spirit-given understanding of God’s saving wisdom; it does not specify a dimensional count or physical mechanism.