Every published response across formats, newest first.
Book
Noah’s Flood Revisited narrows the ark’s manifest with two lexical pillars: a soulish category (nephesh) and a species-level kind (mîn). This response examines both against the Flood texts and the sources the book cites.
Book
Noah’s Flood Revisited sketches how a regional Flood could have worked — named water sources, a conditional footprint, a barrier to breach, and a wind-driven ark. This response tests each step against the book’s own cited sources.
Book
Noah’s Flood Revisited builds its 80,000–45,000-year window from dates that mostly measure something else, under the book’s own admitted uncertainties. This response tests each layer of the chain and the links between them.
Book
Noah’s Flood Revisited reads creation’s ocean boundaries, God’s finished rest, and an established water cycle as ruling out a global Flood. This response examines each reading in its own context.
Book
Noah’s Flood Revisited argues the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies can hide tens of thousands of years. This response tests the gap argument against the formulas themselves, the Cainan evidence, and the book’s own cited critics.
Book
Noah’s Flood Revisited reads the Flood’s universal language as describing all humanity rather than every square mile of the planet. This response tests that reading against Genesis, the covenant, and 2 Peter.
Book
The book raises useful questions about creaturely limits and analogy, but its response must separate established observations, model-dependent physics, philosophical inference, and biblical doctrine.