Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/ Responses to his books, Facebook posts, debates, and public arguments. Do Genesis and Romans 8 Place Carnivory, Pain, and Decay Before the Fall? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-before-the-fall/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-before-the-fall/ Noah’s Flood Revisited reads Genesis and Romans 8 as placing predation, painful toil, and decay inside the original good creation. This response reads the same texts for what they say about food, curse, and subjection. Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear Do Accelerated Tectonics and Decay Make a Global Flood Unsurvivable? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-catastrophic-mechanisms/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-catastrophic-mechanisms/ Noah’s Flood Revisited argues that compressing plate motion and decay into the Flood year generates lethal heat and radiation. This response checks each objection against the models it names. Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear What Do Scripture and Physical Measurements Establish About Constant Laws? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-constant-physics/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-constant-physics/ Noah’s Flood Revisited argues that Scripture and physics together rule out changed constants, closing the door on Flood models that need them. This response examines the measurement suite at full strength — and its scope. Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear Which Geological Records Exclude a Single Recent Flood? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-geological-archives/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-geological-archives/ Noah’s Flood Revisited tours geological archives — stratigraphy, uplift, ice cores, tree rings, raindrops — as timekeepers against a one-year Flood. This response examines what each archive actually shows. Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear What Beyond the Cosmos Argues and How Its Method Works — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/beyond-the-cosmos/what-beyond-the-cosmos-argues/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/beyond-the-cosmos/what-beyond-the-cosmos-argues/ The book raises useful questions about creaturely limits and analogy, but its response must separate established observations, model-dependent physics, philosophical inference, and biblical doctrine. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear Do Creation’s Ocean Boundaries and Rest Exclude a Global Flood? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-creation-boundaries/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-creation-boundaries/ Noah’s Flood Revisited reads creation’s ocean boundaries, God’s finished rest, and an established water cycle as ruling out a global Flood. This response examines each reading in its own context. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear What Establishes the Book’s 80,000–45,000-Year Flood Window? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-flood-dating/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-flood-dating/ Noah’s Flood Revisited builds its 80,000–45,000-year window from dates that mostly measure something else, under the book’s own admitted uncertainties. This response tests each layer of the chain and the links between them. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear Do Genealogical Gaps Add Tens of Thousands of Years? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-genealogical-time/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-genealogical-time/ Noah’s Flood Revisited argues the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies can hide tens of thousands of years. This response tests the gap argument against the formulas themselves, the Cainan evidence, and the book’s own cited critics. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear Do Mîn and Nephesh Limit the Ark to Regional Species? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-kinds-and-ark/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-kinds-and-ark/ Noah’s Flood Revisited narrows the ark’s manifest with two lexical pillars: a soulish category (nephesh) and a species-level kind (mîn). This response examines both against the Flood texts and the sources the book cites. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear How Testable Is the Proposed Regional Flood Mechanism? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-regional-flood-model/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-regional-flood-model/ Noah’s Flood Revisited sketches how a regional Flood could have worked — named water sources, a conditional footprint, a barrier to breach, and a wind-driven ark. This response tests each step against the book’s own cited sources. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear Does “All the Earth” Require a Global Flood? — Answering Hugh Ross https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-universal-language/ https://answeringhughross.com/books/noahs-flood-revisited/noahs-flood-revisited-universal-language/ Noah’s Flood Revisited reads the Flood’s universal language as describing all humanity rather than every square mile of the planet. This response tests that reading against Genesis, the covenant, and 2 Peter. Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT Marc LaClear