Editorial Standards

Every response published on this site is held to the same standards. They exist so that readers can check the work rather than trust it.

Sources you can follow

Every statement about what a source says carries a citation with a locator — a chapter, section, page range, or timestamp that a reader can find in the same edition or recording. When we describe what a book argues, the description is tied to specific chapters or sections, not to the book in general.

Quotation and paraphrase, plainly distinguished

Direct quotations appear in quotation marks, exactly as the source printed them, with the source identified. Paraphrases are shown as paraphrases and are never dressed as quotations.

The strongest form of the argument

Before a claim is examined, it is presented in its strongest available form — including the qualifications its author attaches to it — and it is examined as its author meant it, not as a convenient caricature of it.

What criticism may touch

Criticism here is aimed at arguments, evidence, reasoning, and interpretation. It is never aimed at motives, character, sincerity, intelligence, appearance, or personal qualities — of Hugh Ross or anyone else. The site does not question salvation, does not sensationalize disagreements, and does not manufacture “gotchas.”

Corrections are public

When something published here is shown to be wrong, it is corrected and the correction is entered in the public corrections log. Corrections are additions, never erasures: the record of what changed stays visible. If a cited source later changes or disappears, the response is not removed; the change is documented.

Independence

This site is not affiliated with Reasons to Believe or any other ministry, church, or organization, and no outside body dictates what is published here.